Thursday, January 6, 2011

Illinois Box Score Observations

Opening Comments: Well, if you're Packers fan, at least they won so there's some joy in Mudville this weekend. The Badgers went down, unlike their 3-point shots, by a score of 69-61 in Champaign.

Summarizing the game in a few words: Illinois was on fire shooting and Wisconsin went ice cold from deep in the second half. Illinois decided to pack the paint to dare Wisconsin into jump-shooting themselves back in the game, and they couldn't.

Pace: The game had 58 possessions, one less than our average of 59.

Efficiency: Was it bad offense or bad defense by UW? Both, by UW standards, but more so defense.

UW scored at 1.05 PPP, not close to our yearly average of 1.20.

On defense, UW allowed Illinois 1.19 PPP. That is much higher than our typical 0.92. We need to hold opponents to under 1.00 PPP in the B10 to expect to win consistently.

Shooting: The Illini dominated in quality from everywhere and UW was only the victor in quantity from deep.

eFG%: Illinois hit a hot 63.4% eFG while UW was at a poor 43.3%.

3 pt shooting: Illinois was hot from behind the arc. They were 6 for 12, 50%. UW took nearly three times the shots, 35, and made four more baskets, 10, for 29%. That gave UW an extra 12 points from deep.

2pt shooting: Illinois returned the favor inside. They knocked down 17 of 29 two-pointers for 59%, while the Badgers made 11 of 25 for 44%. They outscored UW by 12 inside to break even from the floor.

Illinois outscored UW in the paint by a 4 points, 20 to 16.

1pt shooting: Illinois won the game at the line. They were 17 for 22, 77%, while UW was a lackluster (for them) 9 of 12 for 75%. That gave the Illini a plus 8 at the line, the margin of victory.

The “We Make More Free Throws Than Our Opponents Attempt” Scoreboard

UW Makes: 174 Opponent Attempts: 209 Difference: -35

With MSU and Illinois again within the next two weeks, I have a feeling this will disappear from a possible stat line.

Floor Location:

Location UW Opp

Arc 49% 26%

Mid Range 10% 20%

Paint 26% 29%

FT Line 15% 25%

Rebounding: Illinois out-rebounded us at on the defensive end and we won the offensive end.

UW Defensive end: There were 20 rebounding opportunities and Illinois got 6, or 30%. That isn't bad, but not great either.

UW Offensive End: When UW shot, there were 19 more rebounding chances, 39, but UW only got 11 or 28%. Again, not bad, but not great for the Badgers.

Turnovers: The Illini had 12 turnovers, or 21% of their possessions ended in turnovers, which is more than the average Badger opponent. UW again took stellar care of the ball, only coughing it up 3 times for 5%. This was a key for UW. UW outscored Illinois 19-4 off turnovers. But, it is the possessions that had no turnovers that were important.

Opportunity Index: UW won the OI by +14 due their care of the ball. Wisconsin was a +5 on offensive rebounds and a +9 on turnovers. From a points perspective, UW was -2 on second chance points and +15 off turnovers for a net +13.

Fouls: UW had five more fouls than Illinois, 20-15. Illinois shot more freebies, largely because being in the bonus with 14 minutes to go in the second half. Illinois netted 8 extra points from the line to go.

Playing time: Bo played 8 ten or more minutes with Wilson getting 10, Jarmusz starter-like 25, and Berggren 11. Gasser had 15 and Bruesewitz each had 19. Taylor and Leuer played Ironman minutes of 38. Evans barely missed with 9.

Bruce played 7 ten or more. On a sidenote, the front runner for my most-hated player on Illinois once McCamey leaves is Meyers Leonard. He's got the face of a 5-year old, has a last name for a first name, and has a swagger/demeanor that he hasn't earned the right to have.

Notable Performances: Leuer and Taylor did a majority of the shooting. Leuer scored 19 on 18 FGA and 4 FTA. Taylor got 19 on 16 FGA and 4 FTA. Leuer had 5 rebounds and Taylor 5 assists. The remarkable stat of the day was Taylor played 38 minutes against dogged defense and didn't have a turnover before fouling out with 5 seconds left in the game.

Keaton scored 11 on 9 FGA (3-6 from the arc), 7 boards, and a block. Jarmusz scored 6 on 2-6 from deep and chipped in a steal. Keaton and Tim, long will the tales of your exploits be told around the campfires of the cheese lover's people.

Wquinton Smith joined the ranks of Club Trillion, having a blank stat sheet in less than a minute of playing time. Congrats Q!

I paid extra attention to McCamey today, and it was amazing to me how many push-offs he gets away with. The classic example was an inbounds play in the second half when he was guarded by Gasser. McCamey faked going to the arc and shoved off Josh while cutting to the basket. He was obviously wide open and got to shoot 2 FTAs from getting fouled by Leuer on the weak side help.

Grading My Predictions

1. Badgers hold the Illini to below 38% shooting from 3. The perimeter D for the Badgers is solid for a second straight game. Unfortunately I think this opens up opportunities for Tisdale and Davis. Miss. They hit 50%.


2. Berggren scores in double figures. With a front-court for Illinois big enough to enable a good deal of playing time, Ice-Berg slightly nullifies Tisdale's production. Miss. He scored two, as Keaton and Jon played 69 minutes total, not leaving much time for Jared to play.

3. Badgers grab more than 38% of the rebounding opportunities on the offensive end and 77% on the defensive. They aren't great at rebounding. Miss and Miss. They grabbed 28% and 70%.

The Badgers suffer their first Big Ten loss to Illinois, 65-62 in 57 possessions. Hit, kinda. They won 69-61 in 58 possessions.

Closing Thoughts: The Badgers return home Wednesday to face the Wolverines of Michigan. Hopefully the friendly rims of the Kohl Center will be more lenient with the Badgers' long distance shots.

Illinois Pre-Game Analysis

Opening Thoughts: I'm really glad this game and the Packer game are today, because I can't bear to have the Rose Bowl on my mind all weekend. The Badgers have their first test on the road in the Big Ten against the the Illinois Fighting Illini. Illinois enters the game at 11-3, 1-0 in the Big Ten, coming off a 87-77 victory at Iowa, which was preceded by losses to Missouri and Illinois-Chicago. They have top 100 wins over Maryland (21), North Carolina (26), Gonzaga (37), Oakland (87), and Iowa (74).


What the expert nerds say: Jeff Sagarin has Wisconsin as a 3-point underdog.

Ken Pomeroy predicts a 63-62 Badger loss in 59 possessions with a 45% chance of victory.


Illinois Likely Rotation:

Position Height Name MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG Off Rating Poss % TO % FT% 2PT% 3PT% 3FGA Rate FT Rate Off Reb% Def Reb% Ast % Blk % Stl %
* G 6'3" Demetri McCamey 32.7 16.0 3.3 7.3 1.1 0.3 123.4 24.3 20.0 73.3% 49.5% 51.6% 41.3% 2.90 1.5 9.6 40.7 0.8 2.0
* G 6'3" .J. Richardson 31.0 12.0 1.9 2.3 0.9 0.3 119.7 16.3 15.3 65.0% 48.1% 46.1% 59.4% 1.56 1.8 5.0 12.7 0.9 1.5
* G/F 6'7" Jereme Richmond 21.8 7.9 4.9 1.4 0.4 0.6 99.2 21.7 18.1 60.0% 49.0% 0.0% 5.8% 2.40 11.1 14.4 11.1 3.0 1.1
* F 6'9" Mike Davis 29.5 11.1 6.4 1.6 0.7 0.9 106.3 19.1 17.3 61.1% 53.6% 0.0% 0.8% 2.86 6.5 17.8 9.5 3.2 1.3
* C 7'1" Mike Tisdale 24.4 9.9 7.4 1.3 0.6 1.5 111.3 21.4 18.7 81.6% 50.0% 38.5% 12.4% 3.62 14.1 20.2 9.2 6.2 1.3
G 6'4" Brandon Paul 19.9 8.1 2.8 1.9 1.1 0.4 98.7 22.7 22.5 66.7% 48.1% 34.9% 45.3% 2.84 3.7 11.8 16.2 2.1 3.2
F 6'9" Bill Cole 18.1 5.4 2.6 1.1 0.7 0.6 138.8 12.1 9.2 75.0% 60.0% 42.1% 71.7% 2.26 7.8 8.2 10.1 3.2 2.2
C 7'0" Meyers Leonard 9.8 2.7 1.7 0.1 0.4 0.5 85.9 15.7 25.7 50.0% 51.6% 0.0% 3.1% 1.88 4.6 14.7 1.3 4.8 2.2
F 6'8" Tyler Griffey 8.7 2.4 1.6 0.1 0.4 0.2 86.6 17.3 21.6 55.6% 40.0% 33.3% 26.5% 2.65 7.7 12.6 1.3 2.5 2.3


Wisconsin Rotation:
Position Height Name MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG Off Rating Poss % TO % FT% 2PT% 3PT% 3FGA Rate FT Rate Off Reb% Def Reb% Ast % Blk % Stl %
* G 6'1" Jordan Taylor 34.2 15.9 4.0 4.9 0.8 0.2 130.8 24.5 9.8 86.2% 48.4% 38.3% 39.7% 3.84 3.1 11.2 30.2 0.7 1.6
* G 6'3" Josh Gasser 26.9 6.3 3.8 2.3 0.5 0.1 117.5 15.5 14.8 88.0% 55.3% 19.4% 44.9% 3.62 6.8 10.4 15.5 0.3 1.3
* F 6'6" Mike Breusewitz 22.8 5.5 3.3 1.2 0.2 0.2 123.4 13.6 18.3 69.2% 57.1% 40.0% 47.2% 2.45 8.5 9.4 10.0 1.1 0.6
* F 6'10" Jon Leuer 32.5 19.5 7.5 2.2 0.8 1.8 128.0 27.7 10.9 81.5% 49.6% 49.2% 36.1% 3.00 6.5 21.6 15.9 5.9 1.5
* F 6'8" Keaton Nankivil 21.8 7.8 4.5 0.8 0.7 1.5 126.3 18.0 17.1 90.9% 59.6% 44.4% 36.5% 1.49 12.0 13.7 7.9 7.2 2.1
G/F 6'6" Tim Jarmusz 19.8 4.2 2.0 1.1 0.6 0.0 143.2 9.6 5.4 60.0% 50.0% 41.7% 85.7% 1.19 4.4 8.0 9.7 0.0 2.0
G/F 6'6" Ryan Evans 13.8 3.7 3.3 1.0 0.1 0.5 82.4 25.0 22.3 76.2% 30.2% 0.0% 5.4% 3.75 8.4 21.0 13.4 3.6 0.3
F/C 6'10" Jared Berggren 9.7 4.7 1.8 0.5 0.1 0.5 111.3 23.9 31.5 71.4% 76.2% 45.5% 34.4% 2.19 7.0 15.9 13.0 5.0 0.6
G/F 6'4" Rob Wilson 7.3 2.5 1.5 0.5 0.1 0.0 123.7 18.5 13.6 75.0% 68.8% 16.7% 27.3% 1.82 9.4 16.7 13.1 0.0 0.8


What Illinois is really good and bad at (Top 25% = Green and Bottom 25% = Red):


Turnover % Rebounding % FTA/FGA 3PT% 2PT% FT% Block% Stl%
Offense 18.5 35.1 27.6 42.0 50.3 68.5 6.7 8.2
Defense 23.4 66.0 33.3 30.6 46.1 64.9 13.5 9.4


What Wisconsin is really good and bad at (Top 25% = Green and Bottom 25% = Red):


Turnover % Rebounding % FTA/FGA 3PT% 2PT% FT% Block% Stl%
Offense 14.4 37.9 28.5 38.1 50.1 80.5 6.0 7.4
Defense 19.4 70.7 28.4 35.6 40.1 71.1 12.5 6.7



Relative Efficiency:

When Illinois has the ball: They have scored a great 1.10 PPP this season, while UW has given up a great 0.92 this season.

When UW has the ball: They have given up an good 0.94 this season, while UW scored a sizzling 1.20 this season.


Pace: Illinois has played at 70 possessions per game to UW's 59.


My expectations:

1. Badgers hold the Illini to below 38% shooting from 3. The perimeter D for the Badgers is solid for a second straight game. Unfortunately I think this opens up opportunities for Tisdale and Davis.

2. Berggren scores in double figures. With a front-court for Illinois big enough to enable a good deal of playing time, Ice-Berg slightly nullifies Tisdale's production.

3. Badgers grab more than 38% of the rebounding opportunities on the offensive end and 77% on the defensive. They aren't great at rebounding.

The Badgers suffer their first Big Ten loss to Illinois, 65-62 in 57 possessions.

Minnesota Box Score Observations (pinch hit by FormerlyBIS)

Opening Comments: Thanks to Turomon for use of his excellent spreadsheet. I only watched the game without sound at a bowling alley as Tuesday night is league night for me. Any win over the Gophers in any sport is much appreciated for this Badger in Gopherland.

Summarizing the game in a few words: 3-pointers and free throws went the Badgers way, and they only turned it over twice the entire game which offset some stats that usually spell doom.

Pace: According to the spreadsheet Turomon provided, it was a 57 possession game. This is slightly slower than UW’s average of just under 60, and way under Minnesota’s norm

Efficiency: UW was 1.19 (season 1.20) and Minn was 1.05 (3rd highest against us this year)

Shooting: This was a mishmash.

eFG%: MN 42%, UW 50%. This was slightly below the eFG% on the year for UW, both defensively and offensively.

3 pt shooting: UW won the quantity and quality battle here. MN was 3 for 12 (25%), UW was 9 for 24 (38%) – that’s +18 points for Bucky.

2pt shooting: MN won this battle in a rout. MN was 20 for 47 (43%), UW was 12 for 27 (44%) – a 16 point swing for Goldy.

It was also 34-12 for MN for points in the paint, and 16-2 in 2nd chance points. Not usually a good formula for Bucky success.

1pt shooting: MN was 11 for 15 for 73% which is not bad, but UW was a game-clinching 17-18 (94%).

The “We Make More Free Throws Than Our Opponents Attempt” Scoreboard

UW Makes: 165 Opponent Attempts: 187 Difference: -22

UW gained 2 – still a long way to go.

Floor Location:

Location UW Opp

Arc 40% 15 %

Mid Range 18% 10%

Paint 18% 57%

FT Line 25% 18%

Rebounding: A very bad night for Bucky or good for Goldy.

UW Defensive end: UW surrendered 17 offensive boards out of 37 opportunities for a defensive rebounding stat of 54%, easily the worst of the season and worst in a long time.

UW Offensive End: UW only got 4 offensive boards out of 29 opportunities for a microscopic 14%, also easily the worst of the season. However, Leuer did get one very important one in the last minute

Turnovers: UW had 2 turnovers, an amazing 4% against a team known to thrive on defensive pressure. Minnesota only committed 8, but as we all know, UW doesn’t rely much on forcing turnovers anyway

Opportunity Index: UW was -7. You don’t win many games with that stat.

Fouls: MN actually ended up fouling more at 18-16. It was lopsided the other way until MN had to foul at the end.

Playing time: UW went 8 deep – only 3 minutes from RW as the starters plus JB, RE, and TJ played 197 of the 200 minutes. MN played only 7 players more than 10 minutes

Notable Performances: Jordan Taylor. Even though it wasn’t his most efficient line of the year, he took over the game when Bucky needed it. He was responsible, however, for all of the Badgers’ missed free throws and half the turnovers (both 1). Unlike Turomon who has some guy named Jon, JT was tabbed my favorite player at the beginning of last year before he had emerged to be, well, Jordan Taylor. Jordan, I believe tales of your exploits will be told around the campfires of Bruce’s cheese-loving people.

Leuer again chipped in 16, but it was a bit of an off night, by his standards. 4-13 from the field, but 6-6 from the charity stripe.

Nank was efficient getting 11 on 5 shots.

Jarmusz cold-bloodedly sank all 3 of his shots for 9 points. That’s7-8 from behind the arc over the last two games. TIM-MAY!

Berggren was big especially early in the game. He looks to be a major weapon for the future, especially against teams with size.

Grading Shetown’s Predictions

1. Badgers rain from deep, knocking down more than 9 threes. The Gophers' zone will allow open looks and the Badgers take advantage. Miss. Exactly 9. You are amazing.

2. A Non-Jordan, -Jon, and –Keaton score in double figures. Let it ride, especially with the Gophers keying on Jordan and Jon and playing zone. Miss. Tim-may with 9 – almost.

3. Badgers grab more than 38% of the rebounding opportunities on the offensive end and 75% on the defensive. They are good o-boarders but not d-boarders. Miss and Miss. By a mile and a mile.

The Badgers kill the Gophers without a reason, 60-55 in 56 possessions. Hit. 68-60 in 57 possessions.

Closing Thoughts: With the rebounding disparity and the deficit with points in the paint, the odds of the Badgers losing a game with those stats are pretty good. UW can’t keep doing that and expect success. On to Chambana.

Minnesota Pre-Game Analysis

Opening Thoughts: Tonight the Big Ten season kicks off for the Badgers against one of their most hated rivals, the Gophers of Minnesota. The brown, furry rodents come into the game at 11-1, with only two top 119 (Ken Pom) wins, against West Virginia and North Carolina. I'm not sure why UNC is #29 right now, but I think that will sort itself out eventually. Other than those victories, the ground squirrels haven't looked like world-beaters against a bunch of cupcakes, and embarrassed themselves in a loss to Tony Bennett's undermanned Virginia team on national television.

What the expert nerds say: Jeff Sagarin has Wisconsin as a 10-point favorite.

Ken Pomeroy predicts a 69-59 Badger victory in 61 possessions with a 15% chance of an upset.

Minnesota Likely Rotation:

Position Height Name MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG Off Rating Poss % TO % FT% 2PT% 3PT% 3FGA Rate FT Rate Off Reb% Def Reb% Ast % Blk % Stl %
* G 6'1" Al Nolen 30.6 9.0 3.0 3.7 2.7 0.1 105.2 17.5 25.7 69.8% 47.4% 37.1% 45.7% 12.29 2.5 7.5 20.2 0.5 5.0
* G 6'4" Blake Hoffarber 33.7 13.9 3.6 5.0 1.7 0.1 126.4 18.7 15.0 85.2% 48.6% 39.1% 71.3% 2.09 3.0 7.9 27.8 0.2 2.8
* F 6'7" Rodney Williams 20.3 6.4 3.8 1.5 0.7 0.4 96.8 19.3 25.3 50.0% 63.0% 12.5% 25.8% 4.19 9.9 9.4 13.6 2.2 1.8
* F 6'8" Trevor Mbakwe 26.8 13.2 9.8 0.7 1.1 1.3 108.3 23.2 19.6 55.3% 62.2% - 0.0% 9.44 12.6 25.2 5.0 5.4 2.2
* F/C 6'11" Ralph Sampson 25.7 11.5 6.0 1.3 0.6 2.2 109.1 21.5 16.2 71.2% 50.0% 30.0% 9.8% 5.10 7.1 16.9 10.2 9.2 1.2
G 6'4" Devoe Joseph 26.5 11.8 2.0 3.3 0.8 0.0 105.8 22.5 19.0 60.0% 38.5% 40.0% 57.4% 2.46 0.6 6.9 24.3 0.0 1.7
F/C 6'10" Colton Iverson 17.3 7.0 5.8 0.8 0.4 0.8 103.6 22.6 20.4 55.8% 51.7% - 0.0% 7.41 16.4 18.8 8.2 5.2 1.3
G 6'4" Austin Hollins 16.8 4.2 1.2 1.5 1.2 0.4 106.5 13.8 22.4 69.2% 40.9% 42.1% 46.3% 3.17 2.7 4.4 15.3 2.7 4.2
G 6'3" Chip Armelin 10.1 4.2 1.7 0.6 0.4 0.1 93.7 21.5 21.7 40.0% 68.0% 20.0% 44.4% 2.22 3.6 13.2 11.7 0.9 2.3
G 6'2" Maverick Ahanmisi 9.3 1.9 1.0 1.2 0.2 0.0 87.0 16.1 35.4 81.8% 37.5% 33.3% 42.9% 7.86 1.0 9.8 21.0 0.0 1.1


Wisconsin Rotation:

Position Height Name MPG PPG RPG APG SPG BPG Off Rating Poss % TO % FT% 2PT% 3PT% 3FGA Rate FT Rate Off Reb% Def Reb% Ast % Blk % Stl %
* G 6'1" Jordan Taylor 34 15.4 4.2 4.8 0.9 0.2 131.9 23.7 10.4 85.7% 47.6% 41.2% 37.8% 3.63 3.4 12.1 29.0 0.8 1.8
* G 6'3" Josh Gasser 27 6.7 3.9 2.2 0.5 0.1 120.0 15.8 16.0 88.0% 57.1% 20.7% 45.3% 3.91 6.6 11.6 15.2 0.3 1.2
* F 6'6" Mike Breusewitz 23 5.9 3.6 1.3 0.2 0.1 126.3 13.9 18.9 69.2% 59.3% 41.7% 47.1% 2.55 8.9 10.1 10.5 0.3 0.7
* F 6'10" Jon Leuer 32 19.8 7.3 2.2 0.8 1.8 129.2 27.9 11.8 79.2% 51.4% 50.0% 35.9% 2.87 6.8 21.4 16.2 6.0 1.5
* F 6'8" Keaton Nankivil 22 7.6 4.6 0.9 0.8 1.5 124.2 17.5 18.5 87.5% 60.0% 41.7% 34.8% 1.16 12.1 13.3 8.2 7.4 2.2
G/F 6'6" Tim Jarmusz 19 3.8 2.0 1.0 0.7 0.0 135.0 9.8 5.8 60.0% 50.0% 36.4% 84.6% 1.28 4.8 8.0 9.1 0.0 2.3
G/F 6'6" Ryan Evans 14 4.0 3.5 1.1 0.1 0.4 85.7 25.3 19.6 76.2% 30.8% 0.0% 5.5% 3.82 8.8 21.7 14.1 3.2 0.3
F/C 6'10" Jared Berggren 8.6 4.4 1.6 0.6 0.1 0.2 109.0 26.5 35.2 71.4% 63.2% 50.0% 38.5% 2.69 8.7 14.3 15.9 2.5 0.7
G/F 6'4" Rob Wilson 7.7 2.8 1.6 0.5 0.1 0.0 129.0 18.3 16.6 75.0% 68.8% 16.7% 27.3% 1.82 9.7 16.0 13.5 0.0 0.8
G 5'10" Wquinton Smith 7.5 0.6 0.9 0.7 0.0 0.0 92.1 12.5 21.4 40.0% 33.3% 0.0% 33.3% 5.56 11.7 3.2 15.3 0.0 0.0
G 6'1" Ben Brust 3.9 0.7 0.6 0.0 0.1 0.0 68.1 17.2 20.0 - 33.3% 14.3% 53.8% 0.00 6.4 12.6 0.0 0.0 1.7
G 6'4" Brett Valentyn 5.1 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.0 106.9 13.1 22.2 - - 33.3% 100.0% 0.00 0.0 8.0 3.9 0.0 0.0


During this holiday season, we should remember to be thankful to our neighbors in East Dakota:

For our wonderful guys Jon Leuer, Jordan Taylor, Mike Breusewitz, and Jared Berggren all hail from that horrid place, and if it wasn't for Minnesota's inability to recruit them, we would have to get 48.2% of our minutes, 62.7% of our scoring, 45.9% of our rebounding, 57.7% of our assists, 52.9% of our blocks, and 48% of our steals from someplace else.


What Minnesota is really good and bad at:


TO % Reb% FTA/FGA 3PT% 2PT% FT% Block % Steal %
Offense 20.7 39.4 49.6 34.7 53.4 62.4 5.3 10.5
Defense 21.8 68.3 28.8 36.7 40.5 70.3 15.9 12.5

What Wisconsin is really good and bad at:


TO % Reb% FTA/FGA 3PT% 2PT% FT% Block % Steal %
Offense 15.3 39.8 28.0 38.2 50.5 79.1 5.9 7.8
Defense 19.9 72.0 28.7 36.3 39.8 70.9 11.8 7.0

Relative Efficiency:

When Minnesota has the ball: They have scored great 1.09 PPP this season, while UW has given up a great 0.91 this season.

When UW has the ball: They have given up an above average 0.97 this season, while UW scored a sizzling 1.20 this season.

Pace: Minnesota has played at 70 possessions per game to UW’s 60.

My expectations:

1. Badgers rain from deep, knocking down more than 9 threes. The Gophers' zone will allow open looks and the Badgers take advantage.

2. A Non-Jordan, -Jon, and –Keaton score in double figures. Let it ride, especially with the Gophers keying on Jordan and Jon and playing zone.

3. Badgers grab more than 38% of the rebounding opportunities on the offensive end and 75% on the defensive. They are good o-boarders but not d-boarders.

The Badgers kill the Gophers without a reason, 60-55 in 56 possessions.