What the expert nerds say:
Jeff Sagarin has Wisconsin as a 1-point underdog.
Ken Pomeroy predicts a 61-60 Badger loss in 59 possessions with a 47% chance of a victory.
Will They Remember That?
November 28, 2010 - Tennessee Tech = MSU's Anthony Ianni attempts a jump shot with the shot clock turned off and a 19-point lead
November 12, 2010 - Eastern Michigan = MSU's Keith Appling attempts a jump shot with the shot clock turned off and a 28-point lead, Adreian Payne rebounds the miss and dunks it home
January 2, 2010 - Northwestern = MSU's Jon Crandell attempts a jump shot with the shot clock turned off and a 21-point lead
December 30, 2009 - Texas-Arlington = MSU's Isaiah Dahlman attempts a 3-pointer with the shot clock turned off and a 21-point lead
November 28, 2009 - UMass = MSU's Mike Kebler attempts a jump shot with the shot clock turned off and a 40-point lead
November 20, 2009 - Toledo = MSU's Delvon Roe throws down an alley-oop with the shot clock turned off and an 11-point lead
November 13, 2009 - Florida Gulf Coast = MSU's Austin Thornton attempts a 3-pointer with the shot clock turned off and a 39-point lead
December 13, 2008 - Alcorn State = MSU's Isaiah Dahlman makes a 3-pointer with the shot clock turned off and a 55-point lead
February 23, 2008 - Iowa = MSU's Durrell Summers attempts a lay-up with the shot clock turned off and a 14-point lead
January 27, 2008 - Michigan = MSU's Durrell Summers dunks with the shot clock turned off and a 17-point lead
Michigan State Probable Rotation:
Position | Height | Name | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | Off Rating | Poss % | TO % | FT% | 2PT% | 3PT% | 3FGA Rate | FT Rate | Off Reb% | Def Reb% | Ast % | Blk % | Stl % |
* G | 6'1" | Kalin Lucas | 29.8 | 14.3 | 2.1 | 3.5 | 1.3 | 0.1 | 104.8 | 24.5 | 20.1 | 75.4% | 46.7% | 42.6% | 28.1% | 3.41 | 1.3 | 5.9 | 23.9 | 0.2 | 2.4 |
* G | 6'1" | Keith Appling | 17.5 | 5.5 | 1.8 | 1.3 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 100.0 | 16.7 | 26.9 | 94.1% | 45.2% | 39.4% | 51.6% | 2.66 | 1.3 | 9.3 | 13.8 | 2.7 | 1.5 |
* G | 6'5" | Durrell Summers | 29.7 | 15.6 | 4.7 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.2 | 106.1 | 22.9 | 13.7 | 63.4% | 44.8% | 43.2% | 45.6% | 2.12 | 5.8 | 11.0 | 4.3 | 0.7 | 1.3 |
* F | 6'7" | Draymond Green | 27.7 | 11.7 | 8.9 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 106.0 | 24.7 | 20.2 | 56.3% | 49.5% | 40.0% | 26.1% | 4.78 | 9.7 | 24.0 | 28.5 | 4.8 | 3.9 |
* F | 6'8" | Delvon Roe | 23.1 | 7.2 | 5.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | 106.5 | 17.0 | 20.1 | 73.1% | 48.6% | - | 0.0% | 2.66 | 8.1 | 17.7 | 9.4 | 5.2 | 2.0 |
G | 5'11" | Korie Lucious | 24.3 | 7.3 | 1.6 | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.1 | 95.8 | 20.6 | 26.5 | 80.0% | 44.1% | 30.8% | 65.7% | 1.52 | 3.0 | 4.2 | 30.3 | 0.3 | 2.3 |
C | 6'10" | Garrick Sherman | 16.6 | 4.6 | 3.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 103.6 | 13.2 | 24.0 | 31.3% | 68.1% | - | 0.0% | 3.40 | 6.8 | 15.6 | 5.3 | 3.2 | 1.6 |
G | 6'5" | Austin Thornton | 12.4 | 3.0 | 2.4 | 1.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 112.1 | 14.7 | 18.5 | 100.0% | 47.8% | 29.4% | 42.5% | 2.00 | 10.9 | 9.9 | 15.1 | 0.5 | 0.6 |
C | 6'10" | Adreian Payne | 8.7 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 83.2 | 21.2 | 30.3 | 42.9% | 53.6% | 0.0% | 3.4% | 7.24 | 13.8 | 17.9 | 5.6 | 11.5 | 3.4 |
C | 6'9" | Derrick Nix | 8.6 | 1.8 | 2.5 | 0.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 90.1 | 16.0 | 22.2 | 45.5% | 45.5% | - | 0.0% | 20.00 | 13.0 | 18.3 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Wisconsin Rotation:
Position | Height | Name | MPG | PPG | RPG | APG | SPG | BPG | Off Rating | Poss % | TO % | FT% | 2PT% | 3PT% | 3FGA Rate | FT Rate | Off Reb% | Def Reb% | Ast % | Blk % | Stl % |
* G | 6'1" | Jordan Taylor | 34.7 | 16.4 | 4.1 | 4.8 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 131.4 | 24.6 | 9.0 | 87.1% | 48.0% | 39.7% | 41.7% | 3.71 | 3.1 | 12.2 | 29.8 | 0.7 | 1.7 |
* G/F | 6'4" | Rob Wilson | 7.8 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 0.4 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 111.2 | 17.6 | 15.2 | 75.0% | 70.6% | 11.1% | 34.6% | 1.60 | 7.4 | 15.5 | 10.2 | 0.0 | 1.3 |
* G/F | 6'6" | Tim Jarmusz | 21.2 | 4.1 | 1.9 | 1.2 | 0.7 | 0.0 | 137.7 | 9.6 | 4.4 | 71.4% | 50.0% | 38.6% | 88.0% | 1.04 | 3.5 | 7.8 | 10.3 | 0.0 | 2.1 |
* F | 6'10" | Jon Leuer | 33.1 | 19.3 | 7.3 | 2.2 | 0.7 | 1.5 | 123.0 | 28.4 | 11.0 | 80.6% | 48.5% | 46.8% | 36.2% | 2.93 | 6.2 | 22.3 | 16.3 | 5.2 | 1.5 |
* F | 6'8" | Keaton Nankivil | 23.2 | 8.4 | 4.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 126.5 | 18.0 | 16.2 | 92.3% | 56.6% | 47.4% | 41.8% | 1.33 | 10.7 | 15.0 | 7.9 | 6.8 | 1.9 |
G | 6'3" | Josh Gasser | 25.1 | 5.6 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 116.4 | 15.5 | 13.8 | 88.0% | 55.0% | 18.2% | 45.2% | 3.57 | 7.2 | 11.0 | 16.2 | 1.0 | 0.6 |
F | 6'6" | Mike Breusewitz | 21.9 | 5.2 | 3.0 | 1.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 120.0 | 14.2 | 17.4 | 66.7% | 59.4% | 37.0% | 45.8% | 2.68 | 8.3 | 9.1 | 10.5 | 3.5 | 0.4 |
G/F | 6'6" | Ryan Evans | 13.0 | 3.5 | 2.9 | 0.9 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 81.8 | 24.8 | 22.3 | 76.2% | 32.1% | 0.0% | 5.1% | 3.68 | 7.6 | 21.4 | 12.8 | 5.6 | 0.6 |
F/C | 6'10" | Jared Berggren | 9.3 | 4.1 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 109.7 | 23.5 | 28.4 | 66.7% | 69.6% | 45.5% | 32.4% | 2.65 | 8.2 | 17.2 | 13.2 | 0.3 | 1.3 |
What Michigan State is really good and really bad at (out of 347 teams):
Turnover % | Rebounding % | FTA/FGA | 3PT% | 2PT% | FT% | Block% | Stl% | |
Offense | 21.9 (#228) | 36.6 (#50) | 37.1 (#192) | 37.5 (#65) | 48.8 (#136) | 65.0 (#270) | 8.8 (#139) | 10.1 (#223) |
Defense | 20.1 (#205) | 68.3 (#140) | 36.9 (#150) | 34.6 (#179) | 40.7 (#11) | 61.7 (#10) | 13.8 (#25) | 11.2 (#73) |
What Wisconsin is really good and really bad at (out of 347 teams):
Turnover % | Rebounding % | FTA/FGA | 3PT% | 2PT% | FT% | Block% | Stl% | |
Offense | 13.8 (#1) | 36.6 (#53) | 28.6 (#327) | 37.6 (#57) | 49.7 (#103) | 80.4 (#2) | 6.0 (#13) | 7.0 (#10) |
Defense | 19.5 (#232) | 71.6 (#36) | 29.2 (#41) | 36.6 (#254) | 41.1 (#16) | 72.8 (#318) | 11.9 (#60) | 6.7 (#333) |
Relative Efficiency:
When Michigan State has the ball: They have scored a good 1.05 PPP this season, while UW has given up a good 0.94 this season.
When UW has the ball: They have given up a good 0.94 this season, while UW scored a sizzling 1.19 this season.
Pace: Michigan State has played at 70 possessions per game to UW’s 59.
My Expectations:
1. Jordan, Jon, and Keaton score a combined 50 points. I think we end up leaning heavily on these three in this one.
2. The Badgers shoot better than 46% inside the arc. I think MSU will force a lot of perimeter shooting by the Badgers, but I like them to shoot much better than MSU's average opponent when they get their chances.
3. The Badgers grab at least 37% of the offensive rebounding opportunities and at least 73% of the defensive. They are finally able to beat up on MSU on the boards for the first time in a while.
The Badgers come up short, losing 65-62 in 61 possessions.
No comments:
Post a Comment